哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2011

Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

Full citation:

Michael Madary, "The dorsal stream and the visual horizon", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 10 (4), 2011.

Abstract

Today many philosophers of mind accept that the two cortical streams of visual processing in humans can be distinguished in terms of conscious experience. The ventral stream is thought to produce representations that may become conscious, and the dorsal stream is thought to handle unconscious vision for action. Despite a vast literature on the topic of the two streams, there is currently no account of the way in which the relevant empirical evidence could fit with basic Husserlian phenomenology of vision. Here I offer such an account. In this article, I show how the empirical evidence ought to be understood in a way that is informed by phenomenology. The differences in the two streams are better described as differences in spatial and temporal processing. Rather than simply "unconscious," the dorsal stream can be better described as making a special contribution to what Husserl identified as the visual horizon.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2011

Series: Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences

Full citation:

Michael Madary, "The dorsal stream and the visual horizon", Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 10 (4), 2011.