哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2011

Pages: 41-62

Series: Husserl Studies

Full citation:

Matheson Russell, "On Habermas's critique of Husserl", Husserl Studies 27 (1), 2011, pp. 41-62.

On Habermas's critique of Husserl

Matheson Russell

pp. 41-62

in: Husserl Studies 27 (1), 2011.

Abstract

Over four decades, Habermas has put to paper many critical remarks on Husserl's work as occasion has demanded. These scattered critical engagements nonetheless do add up to a coherent (if contestable) position regarding the project of transcendental phenomenology. This essay provides a comprehensive reconstruction of the arguments Habermas makes and offers a critical assessment of them. With an eye in particular to the theme of intersubjectivity (a theme of fundamental interest to both thinkers), it is argued that Habermas's arguments do indeed show up deficiencies in Husserlian phenomenology and yet that they do not succeed in proving that we must abandon the methods and tasks of phenomenological research. On the contrary, it is argued that phenomenological methods may well be needed in order to investigate certain philosophical questions that Habermas's theory of communication has thus far only partially addressed.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2011

Pages: 41-62

Series: Husserl Studies

Full citation:

Matheson Russell, "On Habermas's critique of Husserl", Husserl Studies 27 (1), 2011, pp. 41-62.