哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Book Series > Book > Chapter

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1986

Pages: 107-123

Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048184170

Full citation:

, "Realism, teleology, and action", in: The search for a methodology of social science, Berlin, Springer, 1986

Abstract

Durkheim's The Rules of Sociological Method does not begin with a dialogue with fashionable peers, nor, indeed, are Durkheim's philosophical peers seriously addressed in the text. He signals his aims by the striking assertion that methodology has been neglected in sociology. His audience might have thought of Spencer's The Study of Sociology, by then itself two decades old, as a methodology book. Durkheim pointed out, properly, that it was not, and suggested that to find a methodological work of importance one must go back to Mill and Comte. In 1895, when the Rules appeared, almost thirty years had passed since the end of Mill's productive scholarship, forty since the end of Comte's and Quetelet's.

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1986

Pages: 107-123

Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048184170

Full citation:

, "Realism, teleology, and action", in: The search for a methodology of social science, Berlin, Springer, 1986