Zeno's paradoxes of motion

Richard M. Gale

pp. 387-501

in: Richard M. Gale (ed), The philosophy of time, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 1968

Abstract

Because of their extreme subtlety and profundity, there is little of value that can be said in a short space about Zeno's four paradoxes of motion.¹ Accordingly, this introduction will be limited to brief comments upon the selections and will end by considering the relevance that the problems they discuss have to the main question of the previous sections—the objectivity of temporal becoming.