哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1999

Pages: 103-112

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048152605

Full citation:

Sandro Nannini, "The logical connection argument again", in: In search of a new humanism, Berlin, Springer, 1999

Abstract

The positivist-historicist argument about the alleged or denied difference between the study of man and the study of nature began in Germany one century ago with Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften by W. Dilthey (1883) (discussion called by K.-O. Apel Erklären/Verstehen-Kontroverse).1 It finds in Explanation and Understanding, published by G. H. [Von Wright 1971, its clearest contemporary formulation. An epistemological puzzle with strong metaphysical implications (like the distinction between mind and matter) becomes a problem that can be solved or at least clarified by common-language conceptual analysis.

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1999

Pages: 103-112

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048152605

Full citation:

Sandro Nannini, "The logical connection argument again", in: In search of a new humanism, Berlin, Springer, 1999