哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Proceedings > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1997

Pages: 319-329

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048147878

Full citation:

Jaegwon Kim, "What is the problem of mental causation?", in: Structures and norms in science, Berlin, Springer, 1997

Abstract

Giving an account of mental causation — in particular, explaining how it is possible for the mental to causally affect the physical — has been one of the central problems in the philosophy of mind over the past decade or so. The problem of course is not new: Descartes famously was confronted by many of his contemporaries — for example, Gassendi and Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia — with the same question. But this does not mean that Descartes' problem is our problem. For his problem, as his contemporaries saw it, arose from his substantival dualism, a dualism of material and mental substance. But, at least for most of us, that is not the source of our worries about mental causation. Few of us now believe in the existence of substantival minds or some kind of mind-stuff that is ontologically independent of material bodies.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 1997

Pages: 319-329

ISBN (Hardback): 9789048147878

Full citation:

Jaegwon Kim, "What is the problem of mental causation?", in: Structures and norms in science, Berlin, Springer, 1997