哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Book Series > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2011

Pages: 487-498

Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective

ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792

Full citation:

Artur Koterski, "The rise and fall of falsificationism in the light of Neurath's criticism", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011

Abstract

At the peak of his career, Karl Popper wrote he was still waiting for a simple and clear criticism of the theses of his Logik der Forschung (hereafter: LdF) and in one of his last interviews he claimed that all critical arguments were no good. However, already Otto Neurath's 1935 review contained serious counterarguments against falsificationism. Since Popper's doctrine was under intensive reconstruction for decades, we may ask if at any stage falsificationism was able to meet Neurath's objections.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2011

Pages: 487-498

Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective

ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792

Full citation:

Artur Koterski, "The rise and fall of falsificationism in the light of Neurath's criticism", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011