
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2011
Pages: 487-498
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792
Full citation:
, "The rise and fall of falsificationism in the light of Neurath's criticism", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011


The rise and fall of falsificationism in the light of Neurath's criticism
pp. 487-498
in: Dennis Dieks, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, Marcel Weber, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (eds), Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011Abstract
At the peak of his career, Karl Popper wrote he was still waiting for a simple and clear criticism of the theses of his Logik der Forschung (hereafter: LdF) and in one of his last interviews he claimed that all critical arguments were no good. However, already Otto Neurath's 1935 review contained serious counterarguments against falsificationism. Since Popper's doctrine was under intensive reconstruction for decades, we may ask if at any stage falsificationism was able to meet Neurath's objections.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2011
Pages: 487-498
Series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective
ISBN (Hardback): 9789400711792
Full citation:
, "The rise and fall of falsificationism in the light of Neurath's criticism", in: Explanation, prediction, and confirmation, Berlin, Springer, 2011