哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Journal > Journal Issue > Journal article

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2006

Pages: 223-240

Series: Husserl Studies

Full citation:

James G. Hart, "The absolute ought and the unique individual", Husserl Studies 22 (3), 2006, pp. 223-240.

The absolute ought and the unique individual

James G. Hart

pp. 223-240

in: Husserl Studies 22 (3), 2006.

Abstract

The referent of the transcendental and indexical "I" is present non-ascriptively and contrasts with "the personal I" which necessity is presenced as having properties. Each is unique but in different ways. The former is abstract and incomplete until taken as a personal I. The personal I is ontologically incomplete until it self-determines itself morally. The "absolute Ought" is the exemplary moral self-determination and it finds a special disclosure in "the truth of will." Simmel's situation ethics is useful for making more precise Husserl's ethical position.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Springer

Place: Berlin

Year: 2006

Pages: 223-240

Series: Husserl Studies

Full citation:

James G. Hart, "The absolute ought and the unique individual", Husserl Studies 22 (3), 2006, pp. 223-240.