
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2017
Pages: 19-43
Series: Husserl Studies
Full citation:
, "Representation and regress", Husserl Studies 33 (1), 2017, pp. 19-43.
Abstract
I defend a Husserlian account of self-consciousness against representationalist accounts: higher-order representationalism and self-representationalism. Of these, self-representationalism is the harder to refute since, unlike higher-order representationalism, it does not incur a regress of self-conscious acts. However, it incurs a regress of intentional contents. I consider, and reject, five strategies for avoiding this regress of contents. I conclude that the regress is inherent to self-representationalism. I close by showing how this incoherence obtrudes in what must be the self-representationalist’s account of the phenomenology of experience.
Cited authors
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 2017
Pages: 19-43
Series: Husserl Studies
Full citation:
, "Representation and regress", Husserl Studies 33 (1), 2017, pp. 19-43.