哲学杂志철학 학술지哲学のジャーナルEast Asian
Journal of
Philosophy

Home > Book Series > Edited Book > Contribution

Publication details

Publisher: Kluwer

Place: Deventer

Year: 1990

Pages: 193-210

Series: Analecta Husserliana

Full citation:

Wlodzimierz Galewicz, "The aesthetic object and the work of art", in: Ingardeniana II, Deventer, Kluwer, 1990

The aesthetic object and the work of art

Reflections on Ingardens theory of aesthetic judgment

Wlodzimierz Galewicz

pp. 193-210

in: Hans Rudnick (ed), Ingardeniana II, Deventer, Kluwer, 1990

Abstract

Ingarden’s philosophical aesthetics rests on two basic distinctions. The one is that between the work of art and its physical foundation; the other is that between the work of art and the aesthetic object. It is not enough, according to Ingarden, to distinguish the work of art from the material thing in which it is embodied; it is also necessary to differentiate it from the aesthetic objects which may be constituted on its basis. It is only the latter differentiation that I am going to discuss in this paper, although I am aware that many recent philosophers, hostile to any form of the pluralist ontology, are apt to question the former as well. Let me first sketch the outlines of Ingarden’s doctrine.

Cited authors

Publication details

Publisher: Kluwer

Place: Deventer

Year: 1990

Pages: 193-210

Series: Analecta Husserliana

Full citation:

Wlodzimierz Galewicz, "The aesthetic object and the work of art", in: Ingardeniana II, Deventer, Kluwer, 1990