
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1986
Pages: 107-126
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401088947
Full citation:
, "On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology", in: Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986


On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology
pp. 107-126
in: , Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986Abstract
Theories of fieldwork explain why anthropologists do fieldwork. They are theories of method, since fieldwork is a method of doing anthropology (other methods include the arm-chair, the library, by proxy, the questionnaire, informants, and so on).2 There are parallel theories to explain why natural scientists employ the empirical method, i.e. observation and experiment. All schools of anthropology emphasize that fieldwork stands at the center of the subject. Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown, who thought anthropology was a science, placed the same emphasis on fieldwork as does Evans-Pritchard, who denies that it is a science. My concern is to pin down exactly what benefit anthropology and anthropologists derive from fieldwork.
Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Place: Berlin
Year: 1986
Pages: 107-126
Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
ISBN (Hardback): 9789401088947
Full citation:
, "On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology", in: Thinking about society, Berlin, Springer, 1986